Keyword summary
65% 9 analyzed articles/videos 9,915 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scandal results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 5,852 hits . Analysis detected 41,291 faulty-reasoning hits from 41,680 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (29,695 of 37,536 keywords). This Scandal is better (less manipulative) than 79.10% of the peer group. Scandal
Keyword details
Total words: 41,680
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.9% percentile 1.9% BS Score9 analyzed articles41.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.0% 14.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst