Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,683 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Glazebrook results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Negativity Bias , with Hindsight Bias as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 789 hits . Analysis detected 7,033 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,834 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 18% (5,214 of 6,362 authors). This Matt Glazebrook is better (less manipulative) than 82.00% of the peer group. Matt Glazebrook
Author details
Total words: 10,834
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.0% percentile 1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 7.3% 7.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.1%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.6%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst