Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,057 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephanie Giang-Paunon results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 666 hits . Analysis detected 5,201 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,773 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 68% (2,150 of 6,628 authors). This Stephanie Giang-Paunon is worse (more manipulative) than 67.60% of the peer group. Stephanie Giang-Paunon
Author details
Total words: 3,773
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.6% percentile 3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.4% 10.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 17.6% 17.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 9.2% 9.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.0% 7.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.8% 0.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 17.5%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Author 17.6%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.0%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 3.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.5% Loss Aversion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.5% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.6% Red Herring: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst