Keyword summary
27%4 analyzed articles/videos1,928 analyzed words
BS Summary: These S And P 500 Index results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Optimism Bias, and Recency Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 801 hits. Analysis detected 6,373 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,158 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (32,278 of 37,536 keywords). This S And P 500 Index is better (less manipulative) than 86.00% of the peer group.
S And P 500 Index
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
14%S And P 500 Index (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 10,158
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

14% percentile
025507510014.0% percentile
1.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles10.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos