BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 163 hits. Analysis detected 1,152 faulty-reasoning hits from 919 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 38.6% and a BS Rank of 28% (15,964 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 72.90% of the article peer group.

(This is the Warren Buffett Watch newsletter, news and analysis on all things Warren Buffett and Berkshire Hathaway. 
You can sign up here to receive it every Friday evening in your inbox.) 
With 2026 a bit more than half over, Berkshire Hathaway's B shares are down 1.8% year-to-date and 12.4 percentage points behind the S&P 500's 10.7% gain. 
(Including dividends, the S&P is up 11.4% giving it a 13.1 percentage point lead). 
A strong June for Berkshire erased almost a third of its 17.5 percentage point deficit as of June 1, its biggest losing margin of the year so far. 
Even with that June bump, however, it's been a tough Q2 (+ 10 days) for Berkshire with a gain of a bit more than 3% versus the benchmark's strong tech-driven 16% advance, totally erasing what was a slim 1.8 percentage point Berkshire lead at the end of March. 
Last year, Berkshire underperformed the S&P by 5.5 percentage points excluding dividends. 
The deficit was 7.0 percentage points with dividends included. 
Berkshire Hathaway CEO Greg Abel and portfolio manager Ted Weschler aren't featured in the Forbes article on "Sun Valley's Billionaire Summer Camp" now underway in Idaho. 
But they are on the magazine's list of attendees and photos from CNBC's David Grogan and Brendan McDermid of Reuters provide visual evidence they are present at the annual Allen & Co. invitation-only gathering of moguls, along with names like Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, and Sam Altman. 
Warren Buffett went to Sun Valley for decades but has not attended the last few years. 
In 1999, at the height of the dotcom craze, he gave a notable speech at the conference warning that while the internet would be transformative, investors were expecting too much and were bound to be disappointed. 
Some links may require a subscription: 
Warren Buffett describes seeing a convincing AI-generated video of himself that has him worried the technology will make financial scams much more effective. 
AUDIENCE MEMBER : How do you think about the role of technological advances, especially generative AI, on more traditional industries? 
Thank you... 
WARREN BUFFETT : I don't know anything about AI. 
But I do  I do have  I don't  that doesn't mean I deny its existence or importance or anything of the sort. 
And last year I said, you know, that we let the genie out of the bottle when we developed nuclear weapons, and that genie has been doing some terrible things lately. 
And the power of that genie is what, you know, scares the hell out of me. 
And on, the other hand, I don't know any way to get the genie back in the bottle. 
And AI is somewhat similar. 
It's out  it's part-way out of the bottle. 
And it's enormously important, and it's going to be done by somebody... 
Now AI, I had one experience that does make me a little nervous. 
And I'll just explain it. 
Very recently  fairly recently  I saw an image in front of my eyes on the screen, and it was me, and it was my voice and wearing the kind of clothes I wear. 
And my wife or my daughter wouldn't have been able to detect any difference. 
And it was delivering a message that no way came from me. 
So  it  when you think of the potential for scamming people, if you can reproduce images that I can't even tell, that say, I need money, you know, it's your daughter, I've just had a car crash. 
I need fifty thousand dollars wired. 
I mean, scamming has always been part of the American scene. 
But this would make me, if I was interested in investing in scamming, it's going to be the growth industry of all time. 
And it's enabled in a way  you know, obviously AI has potential for good things, too, but I don't know how you  based on the one I saw recently, I practically would send money to myself over in some crazy country. 
(Laughter) 
So I don't have any advice on how the world handles it because I don't think we know how to handle what we did with the nuclear genie. 
But I do think, as someone who doesn't understand a damn thing about it, that it is  it has enormous potential for good and enormous potential for harm, and I just don't know how that plays out. 
BRK.A stock price: $739,750.00 
BRK.B stock price: $493.71 
BRK.B P/E (TTM): 14.70 
Berkshire market capitalization: $1,064,452,706,579 
Berkshire Cash as of March 31: $397.4 billion (Up 6.5% from Dec. 
31) 
Excluding Rail Cash and Subtracting T-Bills Payable: $380.2 billion (Up 3.0% from Dec. 
31) 
Berkshire repurchased $234 million of its shares in Q1 2026. 
Berkshire's top holdings of disclosed publicly traded stocks in the U.S. and Japan, by market value, based on the latest closing prices. 
Holdings are as of March 31, 2026, as reported in Berkshire Hathaway's 13F filing on May 15, 2026, except for: 
The full list of holdings and current market values is available from CNBC.com's Berkshire Hathaway Portfolio Tracker . 
Please send any questions or comments about the newsletter to me at alex.crippen@nbcuni.com . 
(Sorry, but we don't forward questions or comments to Buffett himself.) 
If you aren't already subscribed to this newsletter, you can sign up here . 
Also, Buffett's annual letters to shareholders are highly recommended reading. 
There are collected here on Berkshire's website . 
-- Alex Crippen, Editor, Warren Buffett Watch 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 1.3%Alex Crippen: 1.0%CNBC: 4.6%Confirmation Bias1.3%This article: 0.0%Alex Crippen: 0.2%CNBC: 1.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 17.7%Alex Crippen: 5.3%CNBC: 3.1%Availability Heuristic17.7%This article: 0.5%Alex Crippen: 0.8%CNBC: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.5%This article: 3.9%Alex Crippen: 0.9%CNBC: 0.4%Hindsight Bias3.9%This article: 1.5%Alex Crippen: 0.7%CNBC: 2.8%Overconfidence Bias1.5%This article: 2.9%Alex Crippen: 2.0%CNBC: 6.5%Framing Effect2.9%This article: 0.0%Alex Crippen: 0.0%CNBC: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 2.2%Alex Crippen: 0.7%CNBC: 0.8%Status Quo Bias2.2%This article: 0.0%Alex Crippen: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 3.0%Alex Crippen: 0.3%CNBC: 7.7%Optimism Bias3.0%This article: 6.2%Alex Crippen: 1.5%CNBC: 2.1%Pessimism Bias6.2%This article: 12.0%Alex Crippen: 5.5%CNBC: 6.4%Negativity Bias12.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Crippen: 1.8%CNBC: 1.3%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Crippen: 0.0%CNBC: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Crippen: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Crippen: 0.1%CNBC: 0.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Crippen: 0.0%CNBC: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 1.1%Alex Crippen: 0.6%CNBC: 2.9%Halo Effect1.1%This article: 0.0%Alex Crippen: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Crippen: 0.9%CNBC: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.8%Alex Crippen: 1.3%CNBC: 2.2%Recency Bias4.8%This article: 0.0%Alex Crippen: 0.2%CNBC: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 8.2%Alex Crippen: 1.5%CNBC: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias8.2%This article: 0.0%Alex Crippen: 0.4%CNBC: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Crippen: 0.2%CNBC: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.9%Alex Crippen: 2.3%CNBC: 5.0%Appeal to Authority3.9%This article: 3.3%Alex Crippen: 1.8%CNBC: 1.0%False Dilemma3.3%This article: 4.8%Alex Crippen: 2.4%CNBC: 0.6%Slippery Slope4.8%This article: 0.0%Alex Crippen: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.7%Alex Crippen: 2.4%CNBC: 4.2%Hasty Generalization2.7%This article: 0.0%Alex Crippen: 0.4%CNBC: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Crippen: 0.0%CNBC: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 10.9%Alex Crippen: 3.9%CNBC: 2.5%Appeal to Emotion10.9%This article: 0.0%Alex Crippen: 0.2%CNBC: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 3.4%Alex Crippen: 0.6%CNBC: 3.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.4%This article: 0.0%Alex Crippen: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 3.0%Alex Crippen: 0.4%CNBC: 0.4%Burden of Proof3.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Crippen: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Crippen: 0.1%CNBC: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 14.9%Alex Crippen: 4.4%CNBC: 1.3%Anecdotal14.9%This article: 0.0%Alex Crippen: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.7%Alex Crippen: 0.9%CNBC: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.7%This article: 0.0%Alex Crippen: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Crippen: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 1.3%Alex Crippen: 0.7%CNBC: 0.0%Personal Incredulity1.3%This article: 0.0%Alex Crippen: 0.8%CNBC: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Crippen: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Crippen: 0.3%CNBC: 2.5%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 2.5%Alex Crippen: 0.8%CNBC: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection2.5%This article: 0.0%Alex Crippen: 2.1%CNBC: 3.7%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Crippen: 0.1%CNBC: 0.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Crippen: 0.0%CNBC: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Crippen: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 6.5%Alex Crippen: 3.2%CNBC: 5.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…6.5%

919 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker43%attributed speech527writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 48 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 47 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWarren Buffett • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWarren Buffett • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWarren Buffett • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWarren Buffett • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWarren Buffett • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWarren Buffett • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWarren Buffett • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWarren Buffett • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWarren Buffett • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWarren Buffett • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWarren Buffett • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWarren Buffett • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWarren Buffett • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWarren Buffett • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWarren Buffett • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWarren Buffett • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWarren Buffett • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWarren Buffett • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWarren Buffett • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWarren Buffett • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Warren Buffett

99%flagged-word coverage
392 attributed words100% of attributed speech56% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -11.4 ptsWriter: 11.4%Warren Buffett: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-4.4 ptsWriter: 4.4%Warren Buffett: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.