Keyword summary
92% 16 analyzed articles/videos 9,303 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Red Sea results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Availability Heuristic , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 6,382 hits . Analysis detected 42,772 faulty-reasoning hits from 37,131 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 38% (21,988 of 35,262 keywords). This Red Sea is better (less manipulative) than 62.40% of the peer group. Red Sea
Keyword details
Total words: 37,131
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.6% percentile 2.4% BS Score16 analyzed articles37.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.9% 13.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst