Keyword summary
88% 8 analyzed articles/videos 4,643 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rashida Tlaib results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 3,876 hits . Analysis detected 25,199 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,969 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 41% (22,331 of 37,536 keywords). This Rashida Tlaib is better (less manipulative) than 59.50% of the peer group. Rashida Tlaib
Keyword details
Total words: 20,969
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.5% percentile 2.5% BS Score8 analyzed articles21K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 18.5% 18.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.1% 10.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 18.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 2.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst