Author summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos2,845 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steve Peoples results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 25.9% saturation with 2,578 hits. Analysis detected 14,031 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,937 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 66% (2,166 of 6,365 authors). This Steve Peoples is worse (more manipulative) than 66.00% of the peer group.
Steve Peoples
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
66%Steve Peoples (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,937
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

66% percentile
025507510066.0% percentile
3.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 17.1%17.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.9%6.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 15.7%15.7%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 5.4%5.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.8%4.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 25.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 15.7%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos