Keyword summary
⁠65%4 analyzed articles/videos3,758 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Campaign results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 1,947 hits. Analysis detected 16,902 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,647 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (25,062 of 37,536 keywords). This Presidential Campaign is better (less manipulative) than 66.80% of the peer group.
Presidential Campaign
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠34%Presidential Campaign (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 16,647
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

33% percentile
025507510033.2% percentile
2.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles16.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.7%11.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 9.9%9.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos