Keyword summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos2,777 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Mandelson results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 1,185 hits. Analysis detected 8,051 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,265 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠16% (30,129 of 35,686 keywords). This Peter Mandelson is better (less manipulative) than 84.40% of the peer group.
Peter Mandelson
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠0%Anthony Romano1%
⁠16%Peter Mandelson (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 11,265
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

16% percentile
025507510015.6% percentile
1.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles11.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.5%10.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.4%4.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.1%2.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos