Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 434 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shea Ferguson results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias , Optimism Bias , and Self-Serving Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 208 hits . Analysis detected 1,315 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,736 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 70% (1,955 of 6,508 authors). This Shea Ferguson is worse (more manipulative) than 70.00% of the peer group. Shea Ferguson
Author details
Total words: 1,736
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.0% percentile 3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 7.6% 7.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 12.0% 12.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 6.7% 6.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.0%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hindsight Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 3.7% Anecdotal: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst