Keyword summary
0% 10 analyzed articles/videos 3,770 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Penn Station results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 1,695 hits . Analysis detected 9,978 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,963 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 4% (33,732 of 34,832 keywords). This Penn Station is better (less manipulative) than 96.80% of the peer group. Penn Station
Keyword details
Total words: 20,963
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.2% percentile 1.3% BS Score10 analyzed articles21K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst