Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video632 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Giambrone results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Biased Writer Voice, and Indoctrination, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 460 hits. Analysis detected 1,488 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,528 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (2,352 of 6,628 authors). This Andrew Giambrone is worse (more manipulative) than 64.50% of the peer group.
Andrew Giambrone
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠65%Andrew Giambrone (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,528
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

65% percentile
025507510064.5% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.2%4.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.9%4.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.2%1.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 4.7%4.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 4.0%4.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 3.5%3.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 2.7%2.7%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 1.1%1.1%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Author 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 18.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Actor-Observer Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos