Keyword summary
84% 13 analyzed articles/videos 9,423 analyzed words
BS Summary: These One Big Beautiful Bill Act results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 4,512 hits . Analysis detected 39,833 faulty-reasoning hits from 37,699 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 30% (26,337 of 37,536 keywords). This One Big Beautiful Bill Act is better (less manipulative) than 70.20% of the peer group. One Big Beautiful Bill Act
Keyword details
Total words: 37,699
Article count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.8% percentile 2.2% BS Score13 analyzed articles37.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.0% 12.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst