Keyword summary
47% 5 analyzed articles/videos 5,391 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Noise results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 1,366 hits . Analysis detected 12,486 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,389 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (28,751 of 37,536 keywords). This Noise is better (less manipulative) than 76.60% of the peer group. Noise
Keyword details
Total words: 14,389
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.4% percentile 2.0% BS Score5 analyzed articles14.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.0% 9.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst