Author summary
6% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,536 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christopher Gavin results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Optimism Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 325 hits . Analysis detected 2,313 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,151 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 18% (5,119 of 6,226 authors). This Christopher Gavin is better (less manipulative) than 82.20% of the peer group. Christopher Gavin
Author details
Total words: 5,151
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.8% percentile 1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.3% 6.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.2% 1.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst