Keyword summary
32% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,553 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nirav Shah results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 1,726 hits . Analysis detected 12,440 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,628 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (27,170 of 35,718 keywords). This Nirav Shah is better (less manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group. Nirav Shah
Keyword details
Total words: 13,628
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.9% percentile 2.0% BS Score5 analyzed articles13.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.7% 12.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst