Keyword summary
35% 3 analyzed articles/videos 4,008 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nicotine Pouches results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 1,144 hits . Analysis detected 11,041 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,032 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (30,215 of 34,834 keywords). This Nicotine Pouches is better (less manipulative) than 86.70% of the peer group. Nicotine Pouches
Keyword details
Total words: 16,032
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.3% percentile 1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles16K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst