Keyword summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,129 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New-Hampshire results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 40.1% saturation with 2,562 hits . Analysis detected 11,978 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,382 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.7% and a BS Rank of 89% (4,182 of 37,536 keywords). This New-Hampshire is worse (more manipulative) than 88.90% of the peer group. New-Hampshire
Keyword details
Total words: 6,382
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
89% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 88.9% percentile 6.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 40.1% 40.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 17.7% 17.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 12.3% 12.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 16.5% 16.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Keyword 40.1%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Keyword 30.2%, sitewide 26.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 17.7%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 16.5%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 15.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 4.0% Optimism Bias: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 2.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Red Herring: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.7% Composition/Division: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst