Fox News89%

Hillary Clinton returning to New Hampshire  but not for a 2028 comeback 32%

By Paul Steinhauser0%

3/26/2026, 6:05:23 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 12 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 67 hits. Analysis detected 560 faulty-reasoning hits from 623 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 40.7% and a BS Rank of 32% (15,072 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 68.90% of the article peer group.

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is returning next month to New Hampshire, the state that for a century has held the first primary in the race for the White House. 
But that doesn't mean the Democratic Party's 2016 presidential nominee is looking to make a comeback in 2028. 
While a growing number of potential contenders for the next Democratic presidential nomination have made stops in New Hampshire, as well as in South Carolina and Nevada, two other key early primary states, Clinton said in an interview last month she would not run for president again and that the party had a "good bench." 
Instead, Clinton will headline the New Hampshire Democratic Party's (NHDP) annual spring fundraising dinner. 
The state party announced the news Thursday and said the gala, the McIntyre-Shaheen 100 Club Dinner, would be held April 25 in Nashua, New Hampshire. 
"Through decades of public service  as first lady, a U.S. senator, and secretary of state  Secretary Clinton has fought tirelessly for women's rights and been a champion for economic security around the world," longtime NHDP chair Ray Buckley said. 
"Her work to expand voting rights, strengthen child and family leave policies and combat global health crises has made a lasting impact both here and abroad." 
Buckley told Fox News Digital Clinton will salute retiring Democratic Sen. 
Jeanne Shaheen for her 40 years of public service. 
Shaheen was the first woman in the nation's history elected both governor and senator. 
A spokesperson for Clinton told Fox News Digital the former secretary is excited about returning to New Hampshire. 
But not everyone's happy with Clinton's return to the key New England swing state. 
Responding to the news, a longtime progressive leader in New Hampshire, who asked to remain anonymous to speak more freely, told Fox News Digital, "Although this may be a good invite to raise money for the party, it is another example of how completely tone-deaf the party is to the need for real change. 
"As exemplary as Hillary Clinton’s conduct was with respect to the Epstein congressional subpoena, she’s yesterday’s news, hasn’t offered a new idea in decades and doesn’t serve the needs of building a new Democratic majority in New Hampshire." 
Clinton won the 2008 New Hampshire Democratic presidential primary in her marathon battle against former President Barack Obama for the party's nomination. 
Eight years later, in her second White House bid, she lost the New Hampshire primary in a landslide to progressive champion Bernie Sanders, the senator from neighboring Vermont. 
Since her loss to President Donald Trump in the 2016 general election, Clinton has returned twice to New Hampshire. 
She made a stop in Concord in December 2017 as part of her book tour. 
And she spoke at Dartmouth College in 2019. 
While some on the left take issue with the optics of Clinton's return to New Hampshire, both the former secretary of state and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, have long been supporters of New Hampshire's cherished position at the top of the primary calendar. 
Lucas Meyer, a New Hampshire-based non-profit leader and former longtime president of the New Hampshire Young Democrats, noted that "a lot of New Hampshire Democrats have a lot of affection and love for Secretary Clinton and for her service to our country." 
And Meyer, a former campaign strategist, emphasized the state party’s fundraising dinner that Clinton is headlining "is about funding the apparatus to run campaigns over the next year. 
Secretary Clinton has a pretty broad appeal, and since she’s not running, there’s a little more flexibility for her to raise money for the party and to attract donors to cut checks for the state." 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 1.4%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.5%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 1.7%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 1.1%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 1.7%Fox Nation: 3.0%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 8.9%Fox Nation: 11.9%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 5.6%Paul Steinhauser: 1.2%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias5.6%This article: 8.7%Paul Steinhauser: 0.6%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias8.7%This article: 9.8%Paul Steinhauser: 6.1%Fox Nation: 10.8%Negativity Bias9.8%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 1.2%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.3%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 6.7%Paul Steinhauser: 1.7%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias6.7%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.5%Fox Nation: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 10.8%Paul Steinhauser: 2.2%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect10.8%This article: 6.1%Paul Steinhauser: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect6.1%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.1%Paul Steinhauser: 1.1%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias6.1%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 6.1%Paul Steinhauser: 2.9%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem6.1%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.6%Paul Steinhauser: 3.2%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority6.6%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 1.4%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.4%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 8.7%Paul Steinhauser: 3.7%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization8.7%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 5.5%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.7%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 2.2%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.6%Fox Nation: 2.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.5%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 6.1%Paul Steinhauser: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy6.1%This article: 8.7%Paul Steinhauser: 0.7%Fox Nation: 1.8%Unattributed Quote8.7%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 2.4%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 1.2%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.6%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 1.8%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Paul Steinhauser: 0.5%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

623 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers35%attributed speech406writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageHillary Clinton • 55 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageRay Buckley • 41 words • 0.0% coverageRay Buckley • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageClinton spokesperson • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 54 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 0.0% coverageLucas Meyer • 42 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageLucas Meyer • 35 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Ray Buckley

100%flagged-word coverage
67 attributed words31% of attributed speech38% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Unattributed Quote-13.3 ptsWriter: 13.3%Ray Buckley: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.