Keyword summary
49%6 analyzed articles/videos3,693 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Military Spending results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 1,863 hits. Analysis detected 18,899 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,877 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 23% (29,175 of 37,536 keywords). This Military Spending is better (less manipulative) than 77.70% of the peer group.
Military Spending
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
23%Military Spending (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

22% percentile
025507510022.3% percentile
1.9% BS Score6 analyzed articles19.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.4%9.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.5%8.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.5%7.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate