Keyword summary
61% 4 analyzed articles/videos 7,373 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Microplastics results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 2,865 hits . Analysis detected 15,811 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,648 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (32,247 of 37,536 keywords). This Microplastics is better (less manipulative) than 85.90% of the peer group. Microplastics
Keyword details
Total words: 21,648
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.1% percentile 1.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles21.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.2% 13.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst