Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,795 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Martha Henriques results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 1,819 hits . Analysis detected 8,275 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,482 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 38% (4,161 of 6,628 authors). This Martha Henriques is better (less manipulative) than 62.80% of the peer group. Martha Henriques
Author details
Total words: 11,482
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.2% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.1% 5.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.7% 1.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.5% Indoctrination: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst