Keyword summary
0%9 analyzed articles/videos3,644 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Browning results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and False Dilemma, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 2,365 hits. Analysis detected 18,681 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,740 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 7% (32,460 of 34,832 keywords). This Michael Browning is better (less manipulative) than 93.20% of the peer group.
Michael Browning
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
7%Michael Browning (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 25,740
Article count: 9
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

7% percentile
02550751006.8% percentile
1.5% BS Score9 analyzed articles25.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.2%9.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate