St. Louis Board of Aldermen members, budget director sue over state police board ⁠4%

By Jason Rosenbaum⁠0%

5/13/2026, 9:17:27 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 5 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Bandwagon, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 109 faulty-reasoning hits from 164 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 16.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠4% (20,501 of 21,198 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 96.70% of the article peer group.

St. 
Louis officials have filed another lawsuit against the state-appointed Board of Police Commissioners. 
Alderwoman Daniela Velazquez, Alderman Michael Browning and Budget Director Paul Payne contend the board overseeing the city police department imposes an unconstitutional unfunded mandate. 
In their lawsuit filed in St. 
Louis, the three officials say the law restricting what they can say about the board violates their free speech rights. 
Several other city officials, including Mayor Cara Spencer and Board of Alderman President Megan Green, have filed lawsuits over the police board. 
Earlier this week, the police board sued the city demanding $68 million more for the police budget by June 30. 
The suit contends that the city improperly excluded the Rams settlement funds and the city’s reserves from its general revenue calculations. 
A spokesman for the St. 
Louis Metropolitan Police Department said his agency and the Board of Police Commissioners do not comment on pending litigation. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 12.8%Jason Rosenbaum: 2.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Confirmation Bias12.8%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 13.4%Jason Rosenbaum: 2.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.7%Availability Heuristic13.4%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 12.2%Jason Rosenbaum: 8.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.3%Framing Effect12.2%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 3.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 4.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 2.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 6.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.1%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 3.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.1%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 3.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 2.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 3.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 2.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 4.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.7%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 13.4%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Bandwagon13.4%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 7.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 6.6%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 14.6%Jason Rosenbaum: 2.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.8%Biased Writer Voice14.6%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

164 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker12%attributed speech145writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageLouis Metropolitan Police Department • 19 words • 0.0% coverage
0%flagged-word coverage
19 attributed words100% of attributed speech60% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Biased Writer Voice-16.6 ptsWriter: 16.6%Louis Metropolitan Police Department: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.