Keyword summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 4,754 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniela Velazquez results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and In-Group Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 1,624 hits . Analysis detected 13,778 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,031 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (31,806 of 37,371 keywords). This Daniela Velazquez is better (less manipulative) than 85.10% of the peer group. Daniela Velazquez
Keyword details
Total words: 17,031
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.9% percentile 1.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles17K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.5% 9.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst