BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Post Hoc (False Cause), and In-Group Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 25% saturation with 212 hits. Analysis detected 1,640 faulty-reasoning hits from 849 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 57.2% and a BS Rank of 62% (8,422 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 61.50% of the article peer group.

Five St. 
Louis Board of Aldermen members and several community groups are calling for a general strike on May 1. 
A general strike asks participants to pause all economic activity, including work, school and spending. 
Board President Megan Green joined members Daniela Velázquez, Alisha Sonnier, Laura Keys and Rasheen Aldridge in support of the strike. 
More than a dozen groups in St. 
Louis will hold a rally and march at Aloe Plaza near City Hall at 5:30 p.m. 
Friday, including immigrant advocacy groups, abortion-rights organizations, labor unions and student groups. 
Iana McAllister with the Missouri Workers Center said the organization aims to “fight for workers over billionaires, defend multiracial democracy and (keep) ICE out of our communities.” 
McAllister, a worker at Kaldi’s Coffee involved in efforts to unionize, said the push for unionization is tied to a larger effort to combat wealth inequality and the increased presence of U.S. 
Immigration and Customs Enforcement in St. 
Louis. 
“We’re seeing authoritarianism in our own backyard,” McAllister said. 
“We have to put our power together in order to fight against the billionaires and to fight for the democracy that we deserve.” 
The Missouri Workers Center is simultaneously calling for a long-term boycott of Kaldi’s Coffee, Starbucks, Amazon and Target for anti-labor business practices. 
The boycott also calls out Amazon, Target, Enterprise Car Sales and the St. 
Louis Police Board of Commissioners for alleged ties to ICE. 
Enterprise has yet to comment on any ties to ICE. 
The Missouri Workers Center held a rally against increased ICE presence in St. 
Louis in January and called for a general strike after federal agents fatally shot Renee Macklin Good and Alex Pretti in Minneapolis. 
Organizers marched to Enterprise Center to demand that the company cease renting cars to ICE agents. 
The National Catholic Reporter reported in October that Enterprise Car Sales had two contracts with the U.S. 
Department of Homeland Security, but neither involved ICE. 
Velázquez was the first to support the general strike. 
She said she joined the effort to support her constituents across a range of issues. 
“Our money is going to things that people don't want,” said Velázquez, who represents Ward 6. 
“I live in a progressive, liberal ward, and I know that many of the things happening on the federal level and on the state level, like the income tax, state control, the police department, are not things that the people who I represent are in favor (of).” 
Velázquez said her constituents have mentioned several issues of concern: the war with Iran, ICE presence and a proposed constitutional amendment to expand Missouri sales taxes to permanently eliminate state income tax. 
Sonnier said she joined in support of the working-class people in Ward 7, even those who cannot leave their work responsibilities behind for a day. 
“We know that some of our lowest-wage workers cannot afford to take time off or may not be approved for time off,” Sonnier said. 
“Even if you cannot afford to not work or not go to school, there is a place for your voice, and you have influence.” 
Coordinating economic disruption 
Doug Swanson, who coordinates the University of Missouri-St. 
Louis labor studies program, said strikes and other forms of political resistance have become more peaceful since the National Labor Relations Act was passed to protect workers in 1935. 
“There was a time when we had a lot of violence in the streets  that’s not what we’re seeing these days,” Swanson said. 
“By and large, when you look at the hundreds of thousands of people who show up, most of them are peaceful and respectful. 
I urge everybody not to overreact.” 
Swanson said general strikes were more common in the early 20th century, until an amendment to the National Labor Relations Act in 1947 prohibited “sympathy strikes” in solidarity with other movements. 
“We haven't had a general strike probably since the late '40s,” Swanson said. 
“The original intent for general strikes was to disrupt, in this case, the city of St. 
Louis, such that the power brokers would say, ‘OK, what's happening isn't working.’" 
General strikes have historically aimed to bring economic activity in a city or metro area to a grinding halt. 
But Swanson said general strikes can be difficult to coordinate effectively when each participant has different goals. 
“The call for a general strike can become muddied, because a general strike means a lot of different factions of our community are involved, and each of those factions may have a different outcome that they want,” Swanson said. 
Since employers can now legally fire workers participating in a general strike, Swanson said a successful effort is any disruption significant enough to capture the attention of decision-makers. 
“Successful or not, I don't think it's the end of this kind of desire to look for an alternative,” Swanson said. 
"If you look at the number of protests in the streets over the last few years compared to, say, the first 10 years of this century, there's a lot of evidence that there's a lot of discontent.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.9%Katie Grawitch: 1.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Confirmation Bias4.9%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 10.8%Katie Grawitch: 2.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.7%Availability Heuristic10.8%This article: 2.2%Katie Grawitch: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic2.2%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 4.8%Katie Grawitch: 1.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias4.8%This article: 4.9%Katie Grawitch: 8.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.3%Framing Effect4.9%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 2.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.4%Katie Grawitch: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Status Quo Bias3.4%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 8.1%Katie Grawitch: 4.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 4.8%Optimism Bias8.1%This article: 0.7%Katie Grawitch: 2.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.9%Pessimism Bias0.7%This article: 11.4%Katie Grawitch: 8.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.1%Negativity Bias11.4%This article: 1.8%Katie Grawitch: 2.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.1%Self-Serving Bias1.8%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 17.2%Katie Grawitch: 3.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.2%In-Group Bias17.2%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 2.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.4%Katie Grawitch: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Recency Bias5.4%This article: 1.1%Katie Grawitch: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Primacy Effect1.1%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 1.2%Katie Grawitch: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Ad Hominem1.2%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 2.9%Katie Grawitch: 3.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.6%Appeal to Authority2.9%This article: 3.3%Katie Grawitch: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%False Dilemma3.3%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 12.6%Katie Grawitch: 3.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.7%Hasty Generalization12.6%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 3.8%Katie Grawitch: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Bandwagon3.8%This article: 17.8%Katie Grawitch: 6.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 6.6%Appeal to Emotion17.8%This article: 4.2%Katie Grawitch: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Begging the Question4.2%This article: 17.8%Katie Grawitch: 2.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)17.8%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 3.8%Katie Grawitch: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Burden of Proof3.8%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 6.2%Katie Grawitch: 1.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.6%Anecdotal6.2%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 25.0%Katie Grawitch: 1.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)25.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 3.2%Katie Grawitch: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection3.2%This article: 5.1%Katie Grawitch: 2.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.8%Biased Writer Voice5.1%This article: 9.4%Katie Grawitch: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Indoctrination9.4%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 2.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

849 words analyzed.

Speakers

7speakers80%attributed speech167writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageMegan Green • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageIana McAllister • 27 words • 100.0% coverageIana McAllister • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageIana McAllister • 9 words • 0.0% coverageIana McAllister • 23 words • 100.0% coverageMissouri Workers Center • 22 words • 0.0% coverageMissouri Workers Center • 13 words • 0.0% coverageMissouri Workers Center • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageMissouri Workers Center • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageNational Catholic Reporter • 17 words • 0.0% coverageNational Catholic Reporter • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageDaniela Velázquez • 15 words • 0.0% coverageDaniela Velázquez • 16 words • 100.0% coverageDaniela Velázquez • 47 words • 0.0% coverageDaniela Velázquez • 32 words • 0.0% coverageAlisha Sonnier • 25 words • 0.0% coverageAlisha Sonnier • 24 words • 0.0% coverageAlisha Sonnier • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageDoug Swanson • 8 words • 0.0% coverageDoug Swanson • 29 words • 0.0% coverageDoug Swanson • 24 words • 0.0% coverageDoug Swanson • 23 words • 0.0% coverageDoug Swanson • 6 words • 100.0% coverageDoug Swanson • 31 words • 0.0% coverageDoug Swanson • 13 words • 0.0% coverageDoug Swanson • 16 words • 0.0% coverageDoug Swanson • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageDoug Swanson • 17 words • 0.0% coverageDoug Swanson • 39 words • 0.0% coverageDoug Swanson • 28 words • 0.0% coverageDoug Swanson • 21 words • 0.0% coverageDoug Swanson • 37 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Iana McAllister

100%flagged-word coverage
91 attributed words13% of attributed speech52% writer coverage
0%27.5%55.0%Indoctrination+54.9 ptsWriter: 0.0%Iana McAllister: 54.9%54.9%Quote-first Misdirection+29.7 ptsWriter: 0.0%Iana McAllister: 29.7%29.7%Biased Writer Voice+29.7 ptsWriter: 0.0%Iana McAllister: 29.7%29.7%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.