Keyword summary
0% 16 analyzed articles/videos 6,326 analyzed words
BS Summary: These St Louis City Board Of Police Commissioners results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and In-Group Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 2,331 hits . Analysis detected 23,824 faulty-reasoning hits from 34,404 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 9% (34,320 of 37,536 keywords). This St Louis City Board Of Police Commissioners is better (less manipulative) than 91.40% of the peer group. St Louis City Board Of Police Commissioners
Keyword details
Total words: 34,404
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.6% percentile 1.5% BS Score16 analyzed articles34.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst