Keyword summary
0% 25 analyzed articles/videos 16,920 analyzed words
BS Summary: These St Louis Board Of Aldermen results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 6,025 hits . Analysis detected 57,586 faulty-reasoning hits from 72,506 analyzed words across 25 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 10% (34,105 of 37,536 keywords). This St Louis Board Of Aldermen is better (less manipulative) than 90.90% of the peer group. St Louis Board Of Aldermen
Keyword details
Total words: 72,506
Article count: 25
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.1% percentile 1.5% BS Score25 analyzed articles72.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst