STLPR0%

Aldermen delay vote on data center zoning bill, just days before scheduled recess 8%

By Will Bauer0%

7/2/2026, 10:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 63 hits. Analysis detected 681 faulty-reasoning hits from 616 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 24.9% and a BS Rank of 8% (18,854 of 20,408 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 92.40% of the article peer group.

After back-to-back days of committee discussions, the St. 
Louis Board of Aldermen did not take a vote Wednesday on a bill that outlines zoning regulations for data centers. 
The bill, which would dictate where data centers can be built in the city  and how the city would regulate their energy needs and the noise they produce  will be back on the Housing, Urban Development and Zoning Committee’s agenda next Tuesday. 
That’s just three days before the board’s summer recess starts on July 10, leaving little time to pass the bill. 
Committee members decided to table the bill after debate on whether the legislation had been rushed and if it would have enough votes to pass were to reach the full board. 
1st Ward Alderwoman Anne Schweitzer sponsored the legislation and has argued the city’s approval of the Midtown data center at the old Famous-Barr warehouse warranted taking a vote sooner rather than later. 
“The public is crying out for these regulations to be in place,” Schweitzer said. 
“Those are the people we represent and the people we’re supposed to be listening to.” 
However, Schweitzer was unable to sway all her committee colleagues. 
While they favor regulating data centers, Aldermen Shane Cohn of the 3rd Ward and Rasheen Aldridge of the 14th Ward expressed concern that more time was needed to discuss the finer points of a complicated piece of legislation. 
“I just think we need to make sure that we’re doing it correctly and addressing as many concerns as we possibly can,” Cohn said. 
“The committee is where that work is supposed to happen. 
It’s not supposed to happen on the floor.” 
Committee members introduced 11 amendments to the bill, including three at Wednesday’s meeting. 
The most discussed lays out what rules in the bill are applicable to smaller data centers currently operating in the city. 
The city’s Planning Commission recommended the bill earlier this month. 
Due to the substantial amendments, the commission would need to vote on it again. 
This bill to establish zoning regulations is separate from another bill that creates environmental and reporting requirements for how much water and energy are used. 
The legislation places more requirements on standard data centers  that need more than five megawatts of energy to operate  and major data centers, which would need at least six times as much energy. 
For example, major data centers would need to produce reports on anticipated air and water quality impacts, heat emissions and stormwater impacts. 
Both standards and majors would be required to receive 95% of their annual electricity consumption from renewable sources by the 10th year of operation. 
Advocates for data centers equated the renewable energy standards as a ban on the facilities. 
“There’s no pathway to achieve this level of energy on the timeline you have set in this bill,” said Henry Eubank, director of public policy at Greater St. 
Louis Inc. 
However, Schweitzer said more power generation will need to be built up across the grid to power data centers as more come online, and St. 
Louis can’t regulate what utility companies like Ameren produce. 
“What I think is possible is that there will only be so many of these that can happen under these regulations,” she said. 
“And I think that's OK because I don't think the people of St. 
Louis want to see a proliferation of this industry that is unchecked.” 
If the Board of Aldermen is unable to pass the bill before the two-month recess, President Megan Green is prepared to call a special meeting in the break to vote on the legislation, Green spokesman Sam Wobbe said. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.8%Will Bauer: 1.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Confirmation Bias5.8%This article: 3.2%Will Bauer: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.2%Anchoring Bias3.2%This article: 5.7%Will Bauer: 2.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.7%Availability Heuristic5.7%This article: 2.4%Will Bauer: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic2.4%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 1.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Will Bauer: 4.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.3%Framing Effect3.2%This article: 3.7%Will Bauer: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Loss Aversion3.7%This article: 6.2%Will Bauer: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Status Quo Bias6.2%This article: 5.2%Will Bauer: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect5.2%This article: 10.2%Will Bauer: 8.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 4.8%Optimism Bias10.2%This article: 4.5%Will Bauer: 1.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.9%Pessimism Bias4.5%This article: 7.0%Will Bauer: 4.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.1%Negativity Bias7.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 2.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.1%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 4.5%Will Bauer: 1.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.2%In-Group Bias4.5%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 2.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.1%Will Bauer: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Recency Bias2.1%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 2.4%Will Bauer: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Straw Man2.4%This article: 9.1%Will Bauer: 2.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.6%Appeal to Authority9.1%This article: 1.5%Will Bauer: 1.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%False Dilemma1.5%This article: 3.7%Will Bauer: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Slippery Slope3.7%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.5%Will Bauer: 2.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.7%Hasty Generalization4.5%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 6.3%Will Bauer: 5.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 6.6%Appeal to Emotion6.3%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 5.2%Will Bauer: 2.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.2%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 3.2%Will Bauer: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Burden of Proof3.2%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 1.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 1.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.9%Will Bauer: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Middle Ground3.9%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.5%Will Bauer: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Unattributed Quote4.5%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 2.1%Will Bauer: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.8%Biased Writer Voice2.1%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

616 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers49%attributed speech315writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageAnne Schweitzer • 32 words • 0.0% coverageAnne Schweitzer • 14 words • 0.0% coverageAnne Schweitzer • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageShane Cohn • 38 words • 0.0% coverageShane Cohn • 24 words • 0.0% coverageShane Cohn • 10 words • 0.0% coverageShane Cohn • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coveragePlanning Commission • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageHenry Eubank • 28 words • 100.0% coverageGreater St. Louis Inc. • 2 words • 0.0% coverageAnne Schweitzer • 25 words • 0.0% coverageAnne Schweitzer • 9 words • 0.0% coverageAnne Schweitzer • 23 words • 0.0% coverageAnne Schweitzer • 13 words • 0.0% coverageAnne Schweitzer • 12 words • 0.0% coverageSam Wobbe • 38 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Henry Eubank

100%flagged-word coverage
28 attributed words9.3% of attributed speech31% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Henry Eubank: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-4.1 ptsWriter: 4.1%Henry Eubank: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.