Keyword summary
0%5 analyzed articles/videos3,190 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shane Cohn results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 1,255 hits. Analysis detected 10,786 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,424 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 7% (32,165 of 34,578 keywords). This Shane Cohn is better (less manipulative) than 93.00% of the peer group.
Shane Cohn
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
7%Shane Cohn (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 16,424
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

7% percentile
02550751007.0% percentile
1.5% BS Score5 analyzed articles16.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.4%7.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.6%7.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.1%2.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate