Keyword summary
0%6 analyzed articles/videos4,416 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rasheen Aldridge results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, In-Group Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 2,158 hits. Analysis detected 14,890 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,194 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (31,721 of 35,597 keywords). This Rasheen Aldridge is better (less manipulative) than 89.10% of the peer group.
Rasheen Aldridge
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
11%Rasheen Aldridge (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 21,194
Article count: 6
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

11% percentile
025507510010.9% percentile
1.6% BS Score6 analyzed articles21.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.2%10.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate