Keyword summary
41% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,954 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Megan Degenfelder results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Confirmation Bias , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 467 hits . Analysis detected 3,992 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,816 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 20% (43,829 of 54,726 keywords). This Megan Degenfelder is better (less manipulative) than 80.10% of the peer group. Megan Degenfelder
Keyword details
Total words: 7,816
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.9% percentile 1.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst