Keyword summary
41%3 analyzed articles/videos1,954 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Megan Degenfelder results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 467 hits. Analysis detected 3,992 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,816 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 20% (43,829 of 54,726 keywords). This Megan Degenfelder is better (less manipulative) than 80.10% of the peer group.
Megan Degenfelder
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
20%Megan Degenfelder (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,816
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

20% percentile
025507510019.9% percentile
1.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate