Author summary
61% 1 analyzed article/video 586 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joan Barron results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 221 hits . Analysis detected 1,614 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,344 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 62% (3,452 of 8,910 authors). This Joan Barron is worse (more manipulative) than 61.30% of the peer group. Joan Barron
Author details
Total words: 2,344
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.3% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.4% 9.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.4%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.5%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.0% Ad Hominem: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Red Herring: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst