Bill Sniffin: Can Megan Overtake Barlow? Or Can Bien Overtake The Two Leaders? 57%

By Bill Sniffin

8/1/2026, 3:55:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Availability Heuristic, and Confirmation Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 143 hits. Analysis detected 1,050 faulty-reasoning hits from 859 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 47.1% and a BS Rank of 57% (12,232 of 28,207 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 56.60% of the article peer group.

Governor Barlow? 
Governor Degenfelder? 
Governor Bien? 
Which will it be? 
This race is very close. 
From my perch, it looks like Barlow, Degenfelder, and Bien, in that order with 17 days to go. 
Trust me, with nasty campaigning, gaffes, surprising polling, and perhaps some out-of-blue endorsements, this order can change. 
Final Weeks  Any Surprises? 
We are headed into the final weeks of the primary election season, and one of three Republicans will emerge as our next governor: State Sen. 
Eric Barlow, State Superintendent Megan Degenfelder, or former Marine Col. 
Brent Bien. 
They have run spirited campaigns and offer voters an honest choice among three serious candidates. 
Megan has been endorsed by President Donald Trump, while Bien has been endorsed by the state Republican Party Central Committee. 
And yet, Barlow’s polls show him in the lead, he says. 
Frankly, what I like best about this race is that none of these three candidates are self-funding their campaigns. 
They are ordinary, hard-working Wyoming natives who took very different paths leading to this collision course in the Aug. 
18 Republican primary for governor. 
Barlow, 60, has been around a long time. 
He has built an amazing organization of more than 3,000 supporters spread across the state. 
It’s one of the best grassroots organizations I have seen in the last several decades. 
The late U.S. 
Sen. 
Mike Enzi during his early campaigns, could muster that kind of support. 
Barlow is a state senator from Campbell County. 
He has run a clean campaign and raised a ton of money. 
Degenfelder, 37, might seem like the underdog at first glance. 
Then she landed a heavyweight punch with the endorsement by President Donald Trump, which is gigantic in a state which supported Trump more than any other state. 
She is also the current Superintendent of Public Instruction, overseeing a staff of about 140 and the second-largest budget in state government. 
She also has four years of experience serving on statewide boards. 
Unknown to most voters, she has an astonishing knowledge about Wyoming energy. 
Bien, 58, seems to have been campaigning nonstop for five years. 
He lost the primary to Gov. 
Mark Gordon four years ago. 
Now he is back and has a spirited group of Freedom Caucus supporters working hard for him across the state. 
He also has big campaign signs all over Wyoming. 
Barlow may have more signs but Bien’s are bigger. 
Who Will Win? 
Each campaign is confident in its position. 
Barlow is making his seventh circuit around the state and says he has put more than 40,000 miles on his vehicles. 
A huge number of legislators are working for him, along with plenty of other supporters. 
In many ways, he appears, philosophically, to be a current version of former governor Matt Mead and current governor Mark Gordon. 
Both of those men are pragmatic and middle-of-the-road conservatives. 
For that reason, many voters feel comfortable supporting Barlow. 
Cross-over voters (Democrats and Independents) will support him, which could give him the win. 
Barlow is proud of his campaign and told me he can’t imagine doing anything different. 
He and his wife Kelly have given it their all. 
During a conversation earlier this week, I asked Megan if she sees herself as Wyoming’s version of South Dakota’s Kristi Noem, the popular governor whose political star burned out after some disastrous missteps. 
Megan took umbrage to this and said she would rather see herself modeled after strong female governors like Kim Reynolds of Iowa or Sarah Huckabee Sanders of Arkansas. 
Bien may be having more fun on the campaign trail than anyone. 
During his previous race, he traveled the state in a motorhome and got to experience every corner of Wyoming. 
What surprises most candidates in their first statewide race is just how big Wyoming really is. 
You don’t fully appreciate that until you have a noon event in Evanston and a dinner meeting in Wheatland on the same day. 
Polls? 
Barlow touts his polls as showing him with a comfortable lead. 
Degenfelder says her polls show her doing just fine, and she is pleased with where she stands. 
Bien was unavailable for comment, so we were unable to ask him about his polling. 
Perhaps it is a generational thing, but a look at the number of Facebook followers for each campaign speaks volumes. 
Bien has about 4,400 followers. 
Barlow has about 6,600. 
Degenfelder has 20,000. 
That is an overwhelming gap and could prove to be a predictor of the final outcome. 
Megan is proud member of the Millennial generation, perhaps the first of her age group to run for governor. 
The Trump Effect 
We were down in Texas this spring when Attorney General Ken Paxton took on four-term incumbent Republican U. 
S. 
Sen. 
John Cornyn. 
They qualified for a runoff. 
Trump endorsed the controversial Paxton, who went on to defeat Cornyn by a roughly 2-to-1 margin. 
It was a rout. 
If that kind of scenario plays out in Wyoming, Megan Degenfelder will be elected our next governor. 
Lots can happen over the next two weeks. 
Stay tuned. 
Bill can be reached at williamsniffin@gmail.com. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.7%Bill Sniffin: 4.9%Cowboy State Daily: 1.6%Confirmation Bias8.7%This article: 2.9%Bill Sniffin: 1.8%Cowboy State Daily: 0.5%Anchoring Bias2.9%This article: 9.3%Bill Sniffin: 3.8%Cowboy State Daily: 1.7%Availability Heuristic9.3%This article: 13.9%Bill Sniffin: 4.6%Cowboy State Daily: 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic13.9%This article: 0.0%Bill Sniffin: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 5.2%Bill Sniffin: 4.0%Cowboy State Daily: 2.3%Overconfidence Bias5.2%This article: 3.8%Bill Sniffin: 3.4%Cowboy State Daily: 1.6%Framing Effect3.8%This article: 0.0%Bill Sniffin: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Bill Sniffin: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.2%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bill Sniffin: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 7.3%Bill Sniffin: 1.8%Cowboy State Daily: 1.4%Optimism Bias7.3%This article: 0.0%Bill Sniffin: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.5%Bill Sniffin: 0.1%Cowboy State Daily: 2.2%Negativity Bias0.5%This article: 3.0%Bill Sniffin: 2.3%Cowboy State Daily: 1.0%Self-Serving Bias3.0%This article: 1.2%Bill Sniffin: 0.3%Cowboy State Daily: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error1.2%This article: 0.0%Bill Sniffin: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bill Sniffin: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bill Sniffin: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 7.5%Bill Sniffin: 8.9%Cowboy State Daily: 1.7%Halo Effect7.5%This article: 0.0%Bill Sniffin: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bill Sniffin: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.9%Bill Sniffin: 0.2%Cowboy State Daily: 0.5%Recency Bias0.9%This article: 0.0%Bill Sniffin: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bill Sniffin: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bill Sniffin: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Bill Sniffin: 1.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 5.5%Bill Sniffin: 7.3%Cowboy State Daily: 1.7%Appeal to Authority5.5%This article: 4.4%Bill Sniffin: 1.1%Cowboy State Daily: 1.1%False Dilemma4.4%This article: 2.0%Bill Sniffin: 0.5%Cowboy State Daily: 0.6%Slippery Slope2.0%This article: 0.8%Bill Sniffin: 0.2%Cowboy State Daily: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.8%This article: 7.3%Bill Sniffin: 6.4%Cowboy State Daily: 2.5%Hasty Generalization7.3%This article: 0.0%Bill Sniffin: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Bill Sniffin: 0.3%Cowboy State Daily: 0.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 3.8%Bill Sniffin: 1.0%Cowboy State Daily: 2.3%Appeal to Emotion3.8%This article: 0.0%Bill Sniffin: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 3.7%Bill Sniffin: 1.4%Cowboy State Daily: 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.7%This article: 0.0%Bill Sniffin: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Bill Sniffin: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.1%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Bill Sniffin: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Bill Sniffin: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 16.6%Bill Sniffin: 4.2%Cowboy State Daily: 1.6%Anecdotal16.6%This article: 0.0%Bill Sniffin: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.3%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.2%Bill Sniffin: 0.3%Cowboy State Daily: 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.2%This article: 0.0%Bill Sniffin: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.4%Bill Sniffin: 0.6%Cowboy State Daily: 0.1%Middle Ground2.4%This article: 0.0%Bill Sniffin: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Bill Sniffin: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Bill Sniffin: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.7%Bill Sniffin: 0.7%Cowboy State Daily: 0.6%Unattributed Quote2.7%This article: 0.0%Bill Sniffin: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 7.5%Bill Sniffin: 7.2%Cowboy State Daily: 1.5%Biased Writer Voice7.5%This article: 0.0%Bill Sniffin: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 1.7%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Bill Sniffin: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bill Sniffin: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bill Sniffin: 0.0%Cowboy State Daily: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

859 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers4.0%attributed speech825writer words
Selected voice

Megan Degenfelder

0%flagged-word coverage
28 attributed words82% of attributed speech80% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Biased Writer Voice-7.8 ptsWriter: 7.8%Megan Degenfelder: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-2.8 ptsWriter: 2.8%Megan Degenfelder: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.