Keyword summary
47% 18 analyzed articles/videos 9,910 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Rutte results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 5,676 hits . Analysis detected 39,661 faulty-reasoning hits from 46,364 analyzed words across 18 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 13% (30,713 of 34,986 keywords). This Mark Rutte is better (less manipulative) than 87.80% of the peer group. Mark Rutte
Keyword details
Total words: 46,364
Article count: 18
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.2% percentile 1.6% BS Score18 analyzed articles46.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst