Author summary
0% 10 analyzed articles/videos 799 analyzed words
BS Summary: These int-no_author results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 1,021 hits . Analysis detected 4,976 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,976 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 4% (6,110 of 6,316 authors). This int-no_author is better (less manipulative) than 96.70% of the peer group. int-no_author
Author details
Total words: 11,976
Article count: 10
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.3% percentile 1.2% BS Score10 analyzed articles12K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.5% 8.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst