Keyword summary
85%10 analyzed articles/videos4,064 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maine Senate Race results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.5% saturation with 5,662 hits. Analysis detected 38,082 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,142 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 54% (17,354 of 37,536 keywords). This Maine Senate Race is worse (more manipulative) than 53.80% of the peer group.
Maine Senate Race

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

54% percentile
025507510053.8% percentile
3.0% BS Score10 analyzed articles25.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 22.5%22.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 22.5%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 1.4%Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Tu Quoque: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate