Keyword summary
55% 51 analyzed articles/videos 26,705 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Keir Starmer results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 20,347 hits . Analysis detected 174,516 faulty-reasoning hits from 147,267 analyzed words across 51 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (23,875 of 34,582 keywords). This Keir Starmer is better (less manipulative) than 69.00% of the peer group. Keir Starmer
Keyword details
Total words: 147,267
Article count: 51
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.0% percentile 2.2% BS Score51 analyzed articles147.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 13.8% 13.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst