Keyword summary
52% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,841 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Katie Hobbs results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 1,845 hits . Analysis detected 15,493 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,641 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 19% (29,080 of 35,712 keywords). This Katie Hobbs is better (less manipulative) than 81.40% of the peer group. Katie Hobbs
Keyword details
Total words: 19,641
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.6% percentile 1.8% BS Score5 analyzed articles19.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst