Keyword summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Jennifer Siebel Newsom results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Confirmation Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.4% saturation with 2,788 hits . Analysis detected 22,366 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,644 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 35,995 keywords). This Jennifer Siebel Newsom is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Jennifer Siebel Newsom
Keyword details
Total words: 13,644
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score5 analyzed articles13.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.5% 9.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 19.6% 19.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 11.5% 11.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 20.4%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 19.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 1.4% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.0% Horn Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.1% Straw Man: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst