Keyword summary
0% 18 analyzed articles/videos 4,997 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Humanitarian Crises results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.3% saturation with 6,003 hits . Analysis detected 35,887 faulty-reasoning hits from 31,149 analyzed words across 18 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 41% (21,969 of 36,892 keywords). This Humanitarian Crises is better (less manipulative) than 59.50% of the peer group. Humanitarian Crises
Keyword details
Total words: 31,149
Article count: 18
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.5% percentile 2.5% BS Score18 analyzed articles31.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 17.9% 17.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.1% 11.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 17.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst