Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 650 analyzed words
BS Summary: These House-Republicans results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Framing Effect , and In-Group Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 204 hits . Analysis detected 1,611 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,600 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (25,590 of 37,536 keywords). This House-Republicans is better (less manipulative) than 68.20% of the peer group. House-Republicans
Keyword details
Total words: 2,600
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.8% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst