Author summary
96%2 analyzed articles/videos364 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charles Hilu results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 217 hits. Analysis detected 2,650 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,311 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 84% (1,028 of 6,171 authors). This Charles Hilu is worse (more manipulative) than 83.40% of the peer group.
Charles Hilu
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
84%Charles Hilu (selected)6%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,311
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

83% percentile
025507510083.4% percentile
5.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.1%11.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.0%8.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 16.6%16.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 11.1%11.1%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 10.9%10.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 8.2%8.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Author 9.1%9.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 14.9%14.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 9.8%9.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 14.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 11.1%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 10.9%, sitewide 1.4%Confirmation Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.4%, sitewide 9.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 9.1%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 8.2%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Ad Hominem: Author 6.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos