Democrats Still Knock the Supreme Court, Even When It Checks Trump ⁠100%

By Charles Hilu⁠96%

7/21/2026, 6:48:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 12 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 53.4% saturation with 39 hits. Analysis detected 410 faulty-reasoning hits from 73 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠100% (10 of 20,441 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 100.00% of the article peer group.

During the recently concluded Supreme Court term, President Donald Trump blasted its justices as being “swayed by foreign interests” and as “just being fools and lapdogs for the RINOs and the radical left Democrats.” 
Those comments, made after the Supreme Court struck down his “Liberation Day” tariffs in February, are hardly less critical than the words of House Majority Leader Hakeem Jeffries. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 38.4%Charles Hilu: 9.2%The Dispatch: 3.5%Confirmation Bias38.4%This article: 0.0%Charles Hilu: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Hilu: 5.4%The Dispatch: 1.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Hilu: 9.1%The Dispatch: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Hilu: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Hilu: 7.2%The Dispatch: 1.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 53.4%Charles Hilu: 11.1%The Dispatch: 4.8%Framing Effect53.4%This article: 0.0%Charles Hilu: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Hilu: 4.2%The Dispatch: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Hilu: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Hilu: 0.9%The Dispatch: 1.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Hilu: 2.3%The Dispatch: 2.3%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 53.4%Charles Hilu: 8.0%The Dispatch: 5.1%Negativity Bias53.4%This article: 0.0%Charles Hilu: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Hilu: 2.6%The Dispatch: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Hilu: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Hilu: 4.3%The Dispatch: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Hilu: 4.7%The Dispatch: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Hilu: 1.7%The Dispatch: 1.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Hilu: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Hilu: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 46.6%Charles Hilu: 5.3%The Dispatch: 1.0%Recency Bias46.6%This article: 0.0%Charles Hilu: 2.2%The Dispatch: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Hilu: 0.9%The Dispatch: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Hilu: 6.6%The Dispatch: 1.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Hilu: 3.4%The Dispatch: 1.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Hilu: 3.4%The Dispatch: 3.7%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Hilu: 3.4%The Dispatch: 2.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Hilu: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Hilu: 2.2%The Dispatch: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 38.4%Charles Hilu: 14.9%The Dispatch: 5.5%Hasty Generalization38.4%This article: 0.0%Charles Hilu: 2.5%The Dispatch: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Hilu: 1.8%The Dispatch: 0.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 46.6%Charles Hilu: 9.8%The Dispatch: 2.5%Appeal to Emotion46.6%This article: 0.0%Charles Hilu: 1.2%The Dispatch: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Hilu: 4.6%The Dispatch: 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Hilu: 2.1%The Dispatch: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Hilu: 2.3%The Dispatch: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Hilu: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Hilu: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Hilu: 2.3%The Dispatch: 1.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Hilu: 1.3%The Dispatch: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 53.4%Charles Hilu: 11.1%The Dispatch: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)53.4%This article: 0.0%Charles Hilu: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Hilu: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Hilu: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Hilu: 2.0%The Dispatch: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Hilu: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 46.6%Charles Hilu: 5.3%The Dispatch: 1.3%Unattributed Quote46.6%This article: 46.6%Charles Hilu: 8.2%The Dispatch: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection46.6%This article: 53.4%Charles Hilu: 16.6%The Dispatch: 6.7%Biased Writer Voice53.4%This article: 0.0%Charles Hilu: 0.8%The Dispatch: 1.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 38.4%Charles Hilu: 6.1%The Dispatch: 1.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias38.4%This article: 46.6%Charles Hilu: 10.9%The Dispatch: 1.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias46.6%This article: 0.0%Charles Hilu: 0.0%The Dispatch: 6.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

73 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker47%attributed speech39writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Donald Trump

100%flagged-word coverage
34 attributed words100% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Donald Trump: 100.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Donald Trump: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-100.0 ptsWriter: 100.0%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning +100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Donald Trump: 100.0%100.0%Politically Left Leaning B-71.8 ptsWriter: 71.8%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.