Keyword summary
70% 12 analyzed articles/videos 6,033 analyzed words
BS Summary: These House Democrats results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 5,299 hits . Analysis detected 38,861 faulty-reasoning hits from 36,096 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 30% (26,378 of 37,536 keywords). This House Democrats is better (less manipulative) than 70.30% of the peer group. House Democrats
Keyword details
Total words: 36,096
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.7% percentile 2.2% BS Score12 analyzed articles36.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.7% 14.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst