Keyword summary
65% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,469 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Government Funding results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 1,304 hits . Analysis detected 13,415 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,135 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 33% (25,482 of 37,530 keywords). This Government Funding is better (less manipulative) than 67.90% of the peer group. Government Funding
Keyword details
Total words: 13,135
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.1% percentile 2.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles13.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 6.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst