Keyword summary
65%4 analyzed articles/videos3,469 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Government Funding results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 1,304 hits. Analysis detected 13,415 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,135 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 33% (25,482 of 37,530 keywords). This Government Funding is better (less manipulative) than 67.90% of the peer group.
Government Funding
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
33%Government Funding (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

32% percentile
025507510032.1% percentile
2.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles13.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.7%9.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.9%9.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 6.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate