Keyword summary
⁠79%6 analyzed articles/videos2,713 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fiscal Policy results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.6% saturation with 4,063 hits. Analysis detected 23,986 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,251 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (16,329 of 37,536 keywords). This Fiscal Policy is worse (more manipulative) than 56.50% of the peer group.
Fiscal Policy
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠57%Fiscal Policy (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

57% percentile
025507510056.5% percentile
3.1% BS Score6 analyzed articles15.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 26.6%26.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 13.1%13.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.3%8.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 6.3%6.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.0%1.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.6%7.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 26.6%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Straw Man: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos