Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,005 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Simon Constable results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Overconfidence Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 855 hits . Analysis detected 8,581 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,684 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 68% (2,092 of 6,498 authors). This Simon Constable is worse (more manipulative) than 67.80% of the peer group. Simon Constable
Author details
Total words: 6,684
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.8% percentile 3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.4% 7.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 12.8% 12.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 11.9% 11.9% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 7.7% 7.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 12.3% 12.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 12.8%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.3%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 11.9%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 1.4% Optimism Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Slippery Slope: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst