Keyword summary
54% 7 analyzed articles/videos 1,385 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Financial Crisis results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 2,104 hits . Analysis detected 21,893 faulty-reasoning hits from 27,714 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 10% (33,883 of 37,536 keywords). This Financial Crisis is better (less manipulative) than 90.30% of the peer group. Financial Crisis
Keyword details
Total words: 27,714
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.7% percentile 1.5% BS Score7 analyzed articles27.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst